Conclusion : • More NGOs are involved in HIV programming than before the ENNAA was created . • The increase in the HIV awareness programs implemented jointly gave a stronger impact in the society and raised attention to the issue . • Coordination and partnership has been enhanced and members are encouraged to work jointly to implement awareness programs on HIV under a unified theme . • More sectors of the society, especially potential donors, are aware of the ENNAA through its printed advocacy tools, which also give a more professional image to the network . • Continuous coordination with the NAP has allowed the work to something missing. I would stress this point much more. NAP has recognized ENNAA as main partner in the national AIDS response. Before, v limited corporation with civil society . • ENNAA members have developed in depth knowledge on vulnerable groups and are more flexible to the idea of targeting these groups with intervention programs . • PLHIV are being heard and given the opportunity to speak out their fears and needs in liberty. They also had the opportunity to know that their problems are seriously being looked at through the different levels of the society (governmental, civil, and international).
This definitely boosted their morale and gave hope that they are being heard and could be effective in the society .
|